Speak to Experts

Category: Article

Categories
Article

Patent Application Costs That You Want To Know

The cost of filing for a patent varies depending on the type of invention and how many patents are filed in that area. The cost of a patent application can be expensive for a number of different reasons. The most obvious reason is that it is required to hire an attorney or agent to file the application for you. This means paying them their hourly rate, plus other expenses such as the agent fee, filing fees, and possibly even translation fees.

There are also some less obvious costs that might not be anticipated by many inventors. There are translation fees if the inventor does not speak English fluently, or if they want to file internationally. There are also publication costs that might need to be paid before the patent application is even filed with the USPTO.

Patents are an essential part of any invention, and in order to protect your invention, you need to file for a patent. The cost of filing a patent application can vary from $400-$2,000 depending on the complexity of the invention.

A patent is a legal document that protects an inventor’s idea from being stolen or used by someone else. It gives the inventor an exclusive right to sell or use their invention for a certain period of time.

Patent applications are expensive because they require extensive research and documentation before they can be submitted for approval.

The process of applying for a patent is called “patenting”.

In order to apply for a patent, you must file a provisional application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This is done through the USPTO website. You will need to provide detailed descriptions of your idea and any prior art that exists. If you do not have enough evidence to prove that your idea was invented before another inventor, you may be required to pay a fee to search for prior art.

The cost of filing a patent application varies depending on where it is filed. In this article, we will look at how much it costs to file a patent.

The cost of filing depends on several factors, such as whether the invention is a product or process, what type of patent protection is sought, and whether the applicant has previously applied for patents.

The USPTO charges fees for filing a patent application, which vary depending on where it’s filed.

In the United States, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) charges $1,085 to file a provisional patent application, $2,945 to file a nonprovisional utility patent application, and $4,895 to file a non-provisional nonutility patent application.

File at the USPTO.gov website.

If you plan to file a patent application with the USPTO, you must first determine whether you need to file a provisional or nonprovisional application. You also need to decide whether you will seek a utility or design patent.

Choose between two options: “Traditional” or “Electronic”.

There are two ways to apply for a patent. One option is called “traditional” and involves filing a paper application at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). This method requires you to submit a written description of your invention along with drawings and other supporting materials.

The second option is called “electronic” and allows you to file a provisional application online through the USPTO website. With this option, you can upload a computer-readable version of your application as well as any supporting documents.

The patent application process is expensive. While the average cost of a patent application ranges from $12,000 to $18,000, it can be as high as $25,000.

The most expensive part of the process is the attorney’s fees. For example, the U.S Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) charges an attorney fee for filing a patent application that starts at $1,600 and can go up to $4,500 depending on how complicated the case is. Then there are other costs such as:

– Filing fee: $400-$800

– Search fees: Up to $2,200

– Examination fees: Up to $2 – 3,600

– Issue fee: Up to $4 – 7,500

Categories
Article

Patent Drawing – How to Draw Your Own

Drawing patents is an art form that requires patience, practice, and creativity. It also helps to understand the basics of patent drawings before attempting to create your own.

1. What Is A Patent?

 A patent is a legal document issued by the United States Patent Office (USPTO) that gives its owner the exclusive right to make, use, sell, import, offer to sell, or otherwise dispose of his invention for a period of time. In return, the USPTO gets paid by the inventor. Patents protect inventions from being copied by others who would then benefit from the work without having to pay for it.

 2. How Do You Get A Patent?

 To get a patent, you need to file a patent application at the USPTO. There are two types of patents: utility and design patents. Utility patents last 17 years from their filing date and cannot be transferred. Design patents last 14 years from their filing date.

 3. What Are The Steps Involved In Getting A Patent?

 The first step in getting a patent is to decide if you want to apply for a utility or design patent. If you choose a utility patent, you have to submit a provisional patent application before you actually file a non-provisional utility patent application. On the other hand, if you choose a design patent, you only need to file a non-purificatory design patent application.

 4. What Does A Non-Prolific Design Patent Application Look Like?

 A non-prolific design patent application consists of three parts: 1) a description of the invention; 2) drawings of the invention, and 3) a list of prior art references. Prior art refers to any previous designs or inventions that were patented or published before yours.

 5. What Does A Provisional Patent Application Look Like?

 A provisional patent application is similar to a non-proliferative design patent application except that it does not include drawings. Instead, it includes a written description of the invention along with a table of contents.

 6. What Does An Invention Disclosure Statement Look Like?

 An invention disclosure statement is a short document that describes your invention and provides information about it. It should be filed with your non-prolific patent application.

 7. What Is A Preliminary Examination?

 A preliminary examination is a review of your patent application by the examiner assigned to examine it. After the examiner examines your patent application, he/she may ask questions about it. These questions help him/her determine whether your patent application meets the requirements for issuing a patent.

Here’s how to get started To Draw A Patent Drawing  

First, you’ll need to decide what kind of drawing you’re going to make. There are three main categories of patent drawings: block diagrams, flow charts, and wiring diagrams. Block diagrams show the structure of a device or system. Flow charts illustrate the steps involved in a process. Wiring diagrams show the electrical connections between devices.

Know what you’re drawing.

Once you’ve decided what type of drawing you want to do, you’ll need to learn how to draw it. You can use an online tutorial to help you learn how to draw these different kinds of drawings. Or, you can find a book at your local library or bookstore that teaches you how to draw each type of drawing.

Understand the basics of perspective.

Perspective is the art of making things appear larger or smaller than they actually are. It’s used in everything from architecture to painting to photography. In order to make something appear bigger or smaller, you must first understand the concept of perspective.

Learn about the different parts of a patent drawing.

There are three main parts to any patent drawing: the title block, the description, and the drawings themselves. The title block contains the name of the inventor, the date, and other relevant information. The description explains what the invention does and why it was invented. Finally, the drawings show exactly how the invention works.

Practice with paper and pencil.

You’ll need to practice drawing these diagrams until you’re comfortable with them. Start by practicing on paper first. Then try using colored pencils or markers to make sure you’ve got the right proportions. Once you feel confident, move on to the computer.

Categories
Article Blog

Everything You Need to Know About a Perfect Patent Drawing

Perfect Patent Drawing

What are patent drawings?

A series of images illustrating the accurately specified details of an invention presented during the patent application process is known as a patent drawing. When an illustration is required to fully understand the invention, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) mandates that every patent application be submitted with at least one patent drawing of the proposed invention. Although patient designs have evolved over time, the USPTO maintains stringent drawing guidelines that inventors must adhere to. Patent illustrations printed and published in a uniform style on flexible white paper are included in the official record.

Importance of Patent Drawing

When preparing your claim, it’s a good idea to engage in professional patent illustration services because a patent drawing aids in the comprehension of an invention. Because an invention must be detailed in as much depth and specificity as possible, a patent illustration is essential. This method will assist you in distinguishing your idea from previous ones. 

A design is defined by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as “the visual aesthetic features incorporated in, or applied to, a product of manufacture.” A patent drawing is, in a nutshell, a graphic depiction and explanation of your invention. A patent candidate will almost always be asked to submit a patent design of their invention, particularly if it is capable of being depicted, and doing so would aid in a greater grasp of your innovation.

To understand the full worth of a high-quality patent drawing, consider the whole context of the patenting procedure, which is both costly and complicated. There are two primary goals. To begin, you must distinguish the innovation you are attempting to patent from other pre-existing, well-known inventions, referred to as prior art. From this standpoint, your invention must be new and non-obvious. The next goal is to ensure that you meet all of the patent office’s standards, including detailing in sufficient detail how a person of conventional skill in that technological field may create and use your invention.

Requirements of Patent Drawings

When creating your drawings, always try to follow the rules described in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedures, such as:

● Draw in black and white unless a color is the only way to show a part of the invention.

● On all drawings, use India ink.

● When the illustration is reduced to two-thirds of its original size, make sure the drawing is to scale.

● Above each illustration, including identification such as the name of the innovation, the identity of the inventor, and the application number.

● All drawings should be printed on 11-inch by 8.5-inch white paper or A4 paper. This paper must be quasi, flexible, crease-free, long-lasting, and white.

● Erasures, changes, overwriting, and interlineations must all be removed.

● Make the top and left borders at least 1 inch, the right margin at 3/8 inch, and the base margin at 5/8 inch.

● On two catercorner border corners, place scan target points (cross-hairs).

● Never place one drawing on top of another.

● If required, use symbols and a legend to describe the invention.

● Solid black shading should only be used on bar graphs or to indicate color.

● Use lead lines to bring the reader from the drawing to the description’s accompanying symbol.

Your petition is incomplete if you do not submit patent drawings or do not follow the patent drawing rules. The filing date will be postponed since it is unfinished. This could cost you a patent, especially if other companies are attempting to patent the same innovation. Photographs and color illustrations have their own set of regulations to follow, so be sure to adhere to these as well.

The patent officer will be able to judge whether the innovation is non-obvious and innovative if you follow the patent drawing rules. 

Filing with high-quality patent illustrations also aids in establishing the priority of innovation by allowing for an earlier filing date, which is critical in a first-to-file jurisdiction such as the United States.

Why should you prefer a patent drawing professional?

If you’re drafting an interim patent application, do-it-yourself drawings may be acceptable. If time allows, I would prefer professional patent drawings in a nonprovisional patent application. In contrast to patent attorneys’ costs, illustrator fees are comparatively inexpensive. The time and price of needing to alter the drawings later during prosecution may outweigh any possible cost savings in DIY drawings in a nonprovisional application. To minimize delays and additional costs down the road, we recommend having a nonprovisional application done properly ahead of time.

Patent Drawings generated by an official professional are flawless, with no errors, and the most significant component is that the said professional is familiar with the day-to-day operations of the said Patent Drawing execution. They are familiar with the patent law department’s operating, working, and general aggregation so that in the event of a snag, they can get the following Patent Drawing back on track, either willingly or unwillingly. As a result, a professional’s extensive network and experience will always outweigh a layperson’s limited understanding while attempting to prepare a Patent Drawing.

Categories
Article News

Samsung v. Apple – Supreme Court Limits Damages in Design Patent Cases

design patennt

In a closely watched case involving the cell phone “war” between Apple and Samsung, a unanimous Supreme Court reversed a damages award against Samsung of nearly $400 million and moved the law regarding damages for infringement of design patents into a new area of uncertainty.1

The case involved a successful claim by Apple that Samsung infringed three Apple design patents directed to various ornamental features of a cell phone.2 In a design patent infringement action, besides the traditional measure of patent damages “adequate to compensate for the infringement” available to all patent holders under 35 U.S.C. § 284, there is an “additional remedy for infringement of a design patent” available under 35 U.S.C. § 289 which allows recovery of infringers “total profit.” Specifically, the statute provides that if an infringer “(1) applies the patented design, or any colorable imitation thereof to any article of manufacture for the purpose of sale, or (2) sells or exposes for sale any article of manufacture to which such design or colorable imitation has been applied shall be liable to the owner to the extent of his total profit… .”3 It was under this statute that Apple secured its damages award in a jury trial that was affirmed by the Federal Circuit. The issue presented to the Supreme Court was whether the phrase “article of manufacture” used in Section 289 necessarily referred to the product being sold or could include components of the thing sold.

Apple argued that neither the district court’s jury instructions nor the Federal Circuit’s opinion required that “the relevant article of manufacture must always be the entire product as sold,” but rather the question as to the relevant “article of manufacture” on “which the infringer’s ‘total profit’ should be awarded is, when disputed, a factual question for the jury.” This very factual issue the jury determined against Samsung—at least according to Apple.4 Samsung, predictably enough, disagreed, arguing that the Federal Circuit’s opinion created a categorical rule that the design-patent holder prevailing in an infringement case would always be awarded “the infringer’s total profit on the entire product as sold—no matter how partial the patent or how limited the contribution of the patented feature to the product’s value or sales.”5 Samsung also argued that an award of infringer’s profits should be limited to the profit “attributable to the ‘article of manufacture’ to which an infringing design is ‘applied’” and ‘“made from the infringement’” (i.e. the patent owner would have the burden to prove profits were “attributable to infringement of the patented design.”).6

The United States appeared as amicus curiae supporting neither party. It rejected Samsung’s apportionment limitation, arguing that Section 289 “unambiguously permits a patent holder to recover the infringer’s entire profits from the “article of manufacture” to which the design was applied, regardless of the extent to which those profits are attributable to the infringing design.” However, it also maintained that the ‘“article of manufacture’ will not always be the finished product that is sold in commerce. Rather, the relevant article will sometimes be a component of the ultimate item of sale. In such cases, the patentee is entitled only to the infringer’s total profit for that component, not its total profit for the finished item.” In this, it disagreed with the Federal Circuit’s approach, which is characterized, contrary to Apple’s position, as invariably making the “article of manufacture” the “entire product as sold.” This the United States maintained “would result in grossly excessive and essentially arbitrary awards.” Instead, the United States offered that the ‘“article of manufacture’ inquiry entails a case-specific examination of the relationship among the design, any relevant components, and the product as a whole” and it suggested several detailed considerations that should be weighed in the inquiry.

Source: http://www.natlawreview.com

Categories
Article

Notice of Panel Decision

Notice of Panel Decision
Notice of Panel Decision

In the case of Patent Application Prosecution, the Applicant has the right to appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) for the decision made by the Examiner. The Applicant can File for Notice to Appeal for the claims which are rejected by the Examiner at least twice. The applicant can either file Notice of Appeal or Request for Continuation Examination (RCE). The notice of Appeal cannot be filed after the RCE of the Patent Application. We receive the decision from the PTAB against the Appeal as Notice of Panel Decision.

The Applicant can file for the Notice of Appeal with appropriate Fees for the Examiner’s decision. The Applicant then has to File an Appeal Brief within two months from the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The Filing of Appeal Brief is extended to five months. In the hearing of the Appeal, the conference is held between the Examiner, the Applicant, and the PTAB. As per the hearing, the decision is taken, and we receive the Notice of Panel Decision.

The three Notice of Panel Decisions which are received from PTAB is described below:

  1. Appeal Decision Affirmed-In-Part – This notice indicated that the PTAB has agreed with Examiner regarding the rejection for one set of the claims. The rejection over the other set of claims is withdrawn. In this scenario, the Patent Application reopens for the Prosecution. The Applicant has to then file an Appeal Brief within Two Months from the receiving date of the Notice of Panel Decision.
  2. Appeal Decision Affirmed – This notice indicated that the PTAB has agreed with Examiner rejection of the complete set of claims. In this scenario, the Patent Application reopens for the Prosecution. The Applicant has to then file an Appeal Brief within Two Months from the receiving date of the Notice of Panel Decision.
  3. Appeal Decision Reversed – This notice indicated that the PTAB has agreed with Approved with Applicant. The rejection of the complete set of claims is withdrawn. In this scenario, the Patent Application is sent back to Examiner for Notice of Allowance/Allowability. The Applicant has to then file an Appeal Brief within Two Mths from the receiving date of the Notice of Panel Decision.

Once the Panel Decision is received, the time period to file an appeal brief is modified to one month from the receiving date or two months from the receipt of the Notice of Appeal. We can get the extension for Filing the Appeal Brief for up to five months.

For any further queries, feel free to email me at shweta@mentesocom.wpcomstaging.com.

Categories
Article

Filing Receipt

After filing of the Patent Application with the PTO, we receive an e-filing acknowledgement stating the Patent Application has been received by the PTO. Once the USPTO record the Patent Application and its detail, it sends Filing Receipt to the Applicant. The Filing Receipt is the very first document received from Patent Office after Patent Application is Filed. This document has all the details of the Patent Application recorded by PTO. Thus, the applicant should verify all the details recorded by PTO in the Filing Receipt as any error may affect the Patent Right for the Invention.

Here is the list of details, we should check thoroughly in the Filing document:

1. Related Domestic Applications (if any) 

2. Related Foreign Applications (if any) 

3. Filing Date of the Patent Application 

4. Name and Spelling of all the Inventor/inventors 

5. Applicant 

6. Title of the invention

7. Entity

The life of the Patent is calculated from the Filing Date mentioned in the Filing Receipt. The rights to Patent is given to the Applicant as well as the inventor/inventors as per the records mentioned in the received the Filing Receipt.

Here is the list of details to be docketed in your docketing system is given below:

1.  Confirmation Number

2.  Filing Date

3. Application Number

The Application number helps in checking the status of the Patent Application with the USPTO. The filing date is the date from which the life of Patent is calculated. Thus, we should make sure to verify the document in the Filing Receipt with the efiling acknowledgement.

We should request for Corrected Filing Receipt if there is any discrepancies.  We receive the corrected or updated document within couple of weeks in response to the request.

The PTO office sends notice to File the correct Documents if they find any discrepancies. We receive notices such Notice to File Corrected Application Papers, Notice to File Missing Parts etc.

This helps in tracking the progress of the Patent Application.

 

 

Categories
Article

The 7 Most Common US Patent Docketing Errors

Let’s find out the 7 most common US patent docketing errors. The patent docketing process involves tracking and scheduling of due dates in a patent application process. These due dates are always critical as missing any deadline can lead to the abandonment of the patent application. The responsibility of a docketing professional becomes crucial here. The docketing professional must update the docketing system with accurate due dates ALWAYS.

Together with the accuracy of the dates, it is vital to enter bibliographic details correctly. And yes, it is equally crucial to update the dates on time. Imagine, if we docket the exact dates but after passing the deadline which sometimes is of just five days. Of course, in this situation, your docketing is of no use. I understand this as I handled many such requests in the past. I always ask my team to notify the client via an urgent email in all such time-pressing situations.

Understanding the importance of accurate docketing:  A docketing professional must accurately docket all due dates associated with filing a response to the notices and payment of issue fees, etc. Missing of even a single due date (unintentionally) while performing patent docketing might result in increased expenses (because of the PTO penalty) and delay in the grant of the patent.

I am sharing my experience wherein I believe the following seven documents need special care as these pop-ups are quite frequent at the time of docketing. Here is the list:

  1. Notice of Allowance/Notice of Allowability
  2. Informational Notice to Applicant
  3. Office Actions
  4. Filing Receipts
  5. Notice of Panel Decision
  6. Examiner and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summaries
  7. Notice of Appeal

I firmly believe that errors while docketing these documents can be avoided by thorough understanding and meticulously reading the complete documents. Further, all the notices should be reviewed at least 2-3 times so that we generate accurate deadlines in the docketing system.

With accurate and timely patent docketing we can avoid unnecessary expenses including extension fees etc. and abandonment. High-quality docketing is peace of mind for everyone.

We will discuss each of these documents one by one and explain their process of docketing in our next articles. We will publish these under new articles week after week. Stay tuned! In the meantime, read about our Patent and Trademark Docketing Services  . 🙂

[sg_popup id=375]

Examiner and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summaries:-

Patent docketing is a critical aspect of the patent process that ensures that all relevant information related to a patent application is correctly recorded and tracked. Docketing errors can have significant consequences for both the applicant and the examiner. In this article, we will discuss some of the most common errors in US patent docketing in examiner and applicant-initiated interview summaries.

  1. Missing or Incomplete Information:

One of the most common errors in docketing examiner and applicant-initiated interview summaries is missing or incomplete information. Interview summaries must include all relevant details, including the date of the interview, the names of all participants, and a summary of the discussion. If this information is missing or incomplete, it can cause confusion or delays in the patent process.

  1. Incorrect Dates:

Another common error in docketing examiner and applicant-initiated interview summaries is incorrect dates. The dates of interviews are essential for tracking the progress of the patent application, and errors in these dates can lead to confusion and delays. It is important to ensure that all dates are recorded accurately and consistently throughout the patent process.

  1. Failure to Record Decisions and Action Items:

During an interview, people make decisions and assign action items. These decisions and action items must be recorded accurately in the interview summary to ensure that all parties are aware of what was discussed and agreed upon. Failure to record decisions and action items can lead to misunderstandings and delays in the patent process.

  1. Lack of Consistency:

Consistency is critical in docketing examiner and applicant-initiated interview summaries. All information related to a patent application should be recorded consistently throughout the patent process to ensure accuracy and clarity. This includes the format of the summaries, the terminology used, and the information included.

  1. Failure to Update Information:

Finally, failure to update information in examiner and applicant-initiated interview summaries can lead to confusion and delays. It is necessary to document all modifications to the patent application accurately and promptly in the interview summaries to ensure that all parties are aware of the current status of the application.

In conclusion, docketing errors in examiner and applicant-initiated interview summaries can have significant consequences for the patent process. And It is essential to ensure that all information is recorded accurately and consistently to avoid confusion and delays. Patent applicants and examiners should make a concerted effort to identify and address these common errors to ensure that the patent process runs smoothly and efficiently.

Notice of Appeal:-

The Notice of Appeal is an important document in the US patent process that initiates the appeal process for a rejected patent application. As with all patent docketing, errors in the Notice of Appeal can have significant consequences for the applicant’s ability to appeal the decision. In this article, we will discuss some of the most common errors in US patent docketing in the Notice of Appeal.

  1. Missing or Incomplete Information:

One of the most common errors in docketing a Notice of Appeal is missing or incomplete information. The Notice of Appeal must include all relevant information, including the names of the appellant and the patent examiner, the application number, and the date of the decision being appealed. If this information is missing or incomplete, It is possible either dismiss or postpone the appeal.

  1. Incorrect Dates:

Another common error in docketing a Notice of Appeal is incorrect dates. The Notice of Appeal must be filed within a specific time frame after the decision is appealed. If the appeal is filed too early or too late, it may be dismissed. It is essential to ensure that all dates are recorded accurately and consistently throughout the appeal process.

  1. Failure to Include Required Documents:

Certain documents are essential to the Notice of Appeal, such as the appealing decision, and a copy of the rejected claims. If these essential documents are absent, the appeal might not be acceptable. And It is essential to ensure that the Notice of Appeal includes all necessary documentation.

  1. Lack of Consistency:

Consistency is critical in docketing a Notice of Appeal. All information related to the appeal should be recorded consistently throughout the appeal process to ensure accuracy and clarity. This includes the format of the Notice of Appeal, the terminology used, and the information included.

  1. Failure to Update Information:

Finally, failure to update information in the Notice of Appeal can lead to confusion and delays. It is necessary to accurately describe all changes to the patent application. and promptly in the Notice of Appeal to ensure that all parties are aware of the current status of the application.

In conclusion, docketing errors in the Notice of Appeal can have significant consequences for the patent process. It is essential to ensure that there is accurate documentation of all facts and consistency to avoid confusion and delays. Patent applicants and their legal representatives should make a concerted effort to identify and address these common errors to ensure that the appeal process runs smoothly and efficiently.