A Quick Brief about the Most Common Design Patent Application Rejections

Receiving a rejection for your patent application could be the most disheartening thing. You may spend long hours designing your patents but knowing that it isn’t up to the mark could be quite annoying.  

Many reasons may lead to a rejection of a design patent application. It’s important for you to understand the reason behind the rejection and to work precisely on improving your application. 

Whether it’s inconsistency or ambiguousness, one simply cannot expect their application approval if they haven’t put their best efforts. 

Here we’ll be discussing the top rejections for design patent applications that can be avoided by considering a few crucial aspects. 

102 Rejections 

If you are expecting a patent on innovation in the United States, it’s crucial to understand the legal requirements that would decide whether your patent would be approved or not. 

Most of the patent application drawings could be rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 if there’s a single preceding reference match every element of your application’s claim. 

Reports claim that 102 rejections are quite consistent over every technology center. Mechanical engineering as well as the manufacturing industry is widely impacted more than the other industries. 

You can always seek professional help if you’re not aware of submitting a patent drawing for manufacturing or mechanical engineering. 

103 Rejections 

The § 103 rejection could be caused if the invention doesn’t have a non-obvious improvement as compared to the prior art. The examiner may consider the invention to be obvious and the applicant is asked to further improvise the design. 

This 103 rejection is mostly seen in the field of computer networks, security, or cryptography. It is always a great decision to hire professional patent drawings services if you’re facing issues in submitting your patent application. 

These professionals could surely help you in submitting your patents and minimizing the chances of rejection. 

112(b) Rejections

Another common rejection is the 112(b) rejection, which can occur is the claims aren’t setting forth the subject matter that is claimed to be the invention. Moreover, the claims should essentially point out along with a proper definition of the subject matter, which is to be protected. 

Again, seeking professional help could be the game-changer if you’re still unable to understand the issues with your patents.